Hi All,
Is it possible or okay for setting the publishing DB in a merge
replication setup to Simple recovery model instead of the current
Bulk-logged model?
Will this have an impact to the subscribers?
Thanks.
Aramid
Merge doesn't use the transaction log in the same way as transactional, but
even in this case it is a common misconception that FULL recovery mode is
necessary, so to answer your question 'Yes' - it has no effect as far as the
correct workings of replication are concerned.
Rgds,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
Saturday, February 25, 2012
merge replication and simple recovery model
Labels:
currentbulk-logged,
database,
instead,
merge,
mergereplication,
microsoft,
model,
mysql,
oracle,
publishing,
recovery,
replication,
server,
setting,
setup,
sql
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment