Merge Replication Recovery

Hi,
Had merge replication set up between two servers. with push subscription.
For various reasons the replication stopped running for a few days and now
we have different data at both sites.
Does anybody have a series of steps to get this back up and running other
than the following.
1. Create new db at subscriber.
2. Publish to this new sunscriber from existing publication.
3. Piece in missing data from offline subscriber.(data inserted at
subscriber since merge stopped).
Any other suggestions?
You should be able to synchronize to get things back up, provided you
haven't exceeded the retention period - the publication retention value is
used to determine when subscriptions that have not synchronized within the
retention period should expire and it is set to 14 days by default. If this
is not an option, then I'd use Redgate'd DataCompare to generate the change
script to be applied at the publisher then reinitialize the subscriber.
Rgds,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com/default.asp
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
|||run a validation to determine how out of sync you are. Run the merge agent
until it completes. Chances are you will be in sync after it runs.
The problem with trying to enter the data manually or through applets like
DataCompare is that when you enter this data on the subscriber to try to
sync it
it will raise all sorts of conflicts when you run the merge agent, and
they will be kicked back and you will be returned the state you where in
before.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
|||Fair point, but I was recommending using the RedGate change script at the
publisher and subsequently reinitializing the subscriber. It's not very
sophisticated and the data size might make it unattractive, but it should
work.
Rgds,
Paul
"Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:opso0n92xurj9kur@.hcottter-lap.ap.org...
> run a validation to determine how out of sync you are. Run the merge agent
> until it completes. Chances are you will be in sync after it runs.
> The problem with trying to enter the data manually or through applets like
> DataCompare is that when you enter this data on the subscriber to try to
> sync it
> it will raise all sorts of conflicts when you run the merge agent, and
> they will be kicked back and you will be returned the state you where in
> before.
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
|||Thanks for all the suggestions guys. The replicationanswers website is very
informative. Just a quick question Hilary you mentioned run a validation,
what exactly did you mean by that? write my own routine.
Just for info we did get the snapshot reapplied to the subscription but the
data changes at the subscriber did not get applied, despite being well
within the retention period so we had to maunally rebuild the data.
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
news:eh4LsOdPFHA.2748@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Fair point, but I was recommending using the RedGate change script at the
> publisher and subsequently reinitializing the subscriber. It's not very
> sophisticated and the data size might make it unattractive, but it should
> work.
> Rgds,
> Paul
>
> "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:opso0n92xurj9kur@.hcottter-lap.ap.org...
>
|||if your subscription is a global subscription you should be able to
synchronize!
MB wrote:
> Thanks for all the suggestions guys. The replicationanswers website
is very
> informative. Just a quick question Hilary you mentioned run a
validation,
> what exactly did you mean by that? write my own routine.
> Just for info we did get the snapshot reapplied to the subscription
but the
> data changes at the subscriber did not get applied, despite being
well[vbcol=seagreen]
> within the retention period so we had to maunally rebuild the data.
>
> "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
> news:eh4LsOdPFHA.2748@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
at the[vbcol=seagreen]
very[vbcol=seagreen]
should[vbcol=seagreen]
merge[vbcol=seagreen]
runs.[vbcol=seagreen]
applets[vbcol=seagreen]
subscriber to[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
where in[vbcol=seagreen]